Tapan Kumar Sharma And ORS v. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission Through Its Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12757 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Tapan Kumar Sharma, Son of Dinesh Sharma, R/o Village Barhauna, P.O. Barhauna, P.S. Chandi, District- Nalanda.
2. Akbar Hassan, Son of Abul Hassan, R/o Mohalla Chhawani Ward No 10, P.O. Bhabua , P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur.
3. Braj Bhushan Pandey, Son of Late Ram Shakal Pandey, R/o Village- Patariya P.O. Patariya, P.S. Jehanabad, DistrictJehanabad.
4. Lakshman Rawat, Son of Satyanarayan Rawat, Resident of Village- Gopalpur, P.S. Chanan, District- Lakhisarai, At present 2 NO. Bhuli Quarter Aena, Koliyari, P.O.- Dhansar, DistrictDhanbad, Jharkhand, Pin Code- 828106. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna- 800014.
2. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna - 800014.
3. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna - 800014.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Lalit Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-08-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of present case is identical to the facts of C.W.J.C. No. 9033 of 2018 (Anil Kumar Pandey & Ors. Vs. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission) disposed of on 11.5.2018 and the case of C.W.J.C. No. 7339 of 2017 (Kamlesh Kumar Sinha & Ors. Vs. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission & Ors.) disposed of on 16.4.2018 and submits that the present case should also be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid two cases but, an objection has been raised by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12757 of 2018 dt.13-08-2018 2/2 other side that the aforesaid orders will be applicable in the case of the present petitioners only in the event the process of selection has not been completed.
Let the present case should be governed by the orders passed in the aforesaid two cases subject to the condition that the selection process has not been concluded.
With the aforementioned observation, this writ application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14.08.2018 Transmission Date NA