Sanoj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4694 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2020 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== SANOJ SINGH S/o Sahel Singh R/o Village- Madopur, P.S.- Bheldi, DistrictSaran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No.98 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, informant alleged that while he was at his home, due to land dispute, petitioner along with accused persons have assaulted him with rod, danda. They also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4694 of 2021(2) dt.26-03-2021 2/2 beaten daughter of the informant and snatched gold locket from her neck.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. There is a case and counter-case between the parties due to land dispute as admitted in the F.I.R. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. No specific overtact has been leveled against the petitioner. Doctor has opined the injury to be simple in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 22.09.2020.

Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No.98 of 2020. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T