Sudhir Mandal v. The State Of Bihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11119 of 2024 ====================================================== Sudhir Mandal Late Sukhdeo Mandal @ Sukdev Mandal Resident of VillageParbatta, P.O.- Sahu Parbatta, P.S.- Ismilepur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additiional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 5.

The District Land Settlement Officer, Bhagalpur. 6.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Naugachia, Bhagalpur. 7.

The Circle Officer, Ismailepur, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for direction upon the District Land Settlement Officer, Bhagalpur (respondent No.5) to correct the current Revisional Survey Khatiyan in which petitioner's land has wrongly been entered in the name of other persons in view of Kramik/cadastral khatiyan in which the land in question is entered in name of petitioner's ancestor.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11119 of 2024 dt.01-08-2024 2/2 3.

Land in question pertains to Muja Parbatta, Thana No. 33, P.S. Kahalgaon, at present PS- Ismilempur, Tauji No. 265, 300, 301, 302, District Bhagalpur given 3 acre 91 decimal of land.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be approaching the respondent No. 5, the District Land Settlement Officer, Bhagalpur in the next four weeks. 5.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State does not object to the limited prayer raised by the petitioner for approaching the respondent No.5 for redressal of his greivance. 6.

In that case, the concerned respondent No.5, the District Land Settlement Officer, Bhagalpur shall be duty bound to take up the matter and after hearing all the necessary parties will conclude the matter and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law in next six months.

7.

The present writ petition stands disposed of. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 09-08-2024 Transmission Date N/A