Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50640/2026bail granted

Pintu Yadav @ Ramnandan Yadav @ Ramnandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50640 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2026 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Pintu Yadav @ Ramnandan Yadav @ Ramnandan Kumar S/O Debu Yadav @ Debendra Yadav Resident of Village- Hariraha Rustampur, P.S.- Lokhi, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sakri P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026, G.R No. 209 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 318(4), 338 and 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 504 liters liquor was recovered from Car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50640 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by Co-accused which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is further submitted that car in question does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026, G.R No. 209 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) sukriti/- U T