← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11312/2025disposed

Mithlesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-24Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11312 of 2025 ====================================================== Mithlesh Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Baidyanath Singh, Resident of MohallaMahavir Colony, Ward no. 07, P.S. Nagar, District-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Deputy Director General of Police, Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Special Branch, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Special Branch, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The grievance of petitioner is confined to incorrect and wrong pay fixation, besides the arbitrary action of the respondents in extending the admissible pay scale to other identically situated person, but in case of the petitioner, discrimination has been caused. For redressal of the grievance, the petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the respondent no. 3, the copy of which is placed on record as Annexure 5 to the writ petition.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner superannuated from the post of police subinspector on 31.01.2025, however despite repeated request, his

Patna High Court CWJC No.11312 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 grievance has not been redressed, compelling him to approach before this Court.

4. Learned Advocate for the State submits that since the representation has been filed on 04.06.2025, the same shall be considered by the concerned authorities and bring to its logical conclusion.

5. Having regard to the limited grievance of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order, considering the facts that the case of the petitioner is based on parity, preferably within a period of 12 weeks' from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

6. The writ petition stands disposed.

(Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U