Lalan Kumar Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6721 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2020 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Lalan Kumar Kamat Son Of Late Indradev Kamat Resident Of Padma, Police Station - Ladania, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Soban Asghar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that although Vakalatnama in the instant case was filed for both the accused namely, Lalan Kumar Kamat and Chandan Kumar Kamat, however, due to typographical error the petition was filed only with respect to Lalan Kumar Kamat. It is submitted that as such a separate bail petition for Chandan Kumar Kamat will be filed.

The instant application is confined to the sole petitioner Lalan Kumar Kamat.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ladania P.S. Case no. 221 of 2020 registered under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6721 of 2021(2) dt.09-04-2021 2/2 As per allegation in the FIR, 45 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the person or house of the petitioner. He has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2020, he has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the period in custody and the investigation in the case having concluded, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ladania P.S. Case no. 221 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge IInd - cum - Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U