← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12869/2022withdrawn

Kanhaiya Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-08Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12869 of 2022 ====================================================== Kanhaiya Kumar S/o Late Gopal Rajak, Resident of Mohalla - Gaighat South Gali, P.O.- Guljarbagh, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Industry Department Govt. of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Director, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Handloom and Handicraft Corporation Limited, Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

4.

The Director of Handloom and Sericulture Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Secretary Personnel and Administrative Department, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sadanand Prasad Deo, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 For the Handloom :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Vijeta Kumari, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 The matter is placed under the heading "For Orders on Office Notes" with a defect that for the identical relief, the petitioner had come before this Court in CWJC No. 2429 of 2014, which came to be disposed off on 07.02.2014, with a direction to the respondent no. 3, namely, Managing Director, Bihar State Handloom and Handicraft Corporation Limited, Patna to take a final decision on the petitioner's claim for the appointment on compassionate ground within six months; hence, MJC petition is required to be filed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12869 of 2022(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/2

2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner referring to Annexure-4 to the writ petition has contended that on 07.06.2022, the concerned respondents has come out with an order suggesting that the application of the petitioner is still under consideration.

3. This Court finds that the objection raised by the stamp reporter is sustainable.

4. In view, thereof, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a proper application.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U