Patna High CourtMJC/1135/2016disposed

Shyam Bihari Pandey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-03Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1135 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Shyam Bihari Pandey, son of Late Sheodhwaja Pandey

2. Ram Awatar Singh, son of Late Jamir Singh

3. Rang Nath Pandey, son of Ramdhwaja Pandey

4. Govind Pandey @ Govind, son of Late Jagdish Pandey All are resident of Village- Dinya, P.O.- Ramgarh, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur (Bhabua), Bihar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shri Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, I.A.S. the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

3. Shri Ramashankar Singh, the District Development Commissioner, Kaimur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

4. Shri Avinash Kumar, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms Mohaniya, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

5. Dr. Jitendra Gupta, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohaniya, DistrictKaimur (Bhabua).

6. Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, the Anchal Adhikari, Mohaniya, DistrictKaimur (Bhabua).

7. Shri Sanjay Kumar, the Programme Officer, Mohaniya, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

8. Harprit Kaur, I.P.S. the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur, districtKaimur (Bhabua).

9. Shri Shashi Bhushan Thakur, the Officer-in-charge, Mohaniya, DistrictKaimur (Bhabua).

10. Praman Pasi, son of Late Rajeshwar Pasi, resident of village- Khurd Gaura, P.S.- Jamurana, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bhokhari, P.S.- Mohaniya, DistrictKaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamala Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 03-08-2016 The road complained of by the petitioners in the writ petition which was required to be removed under the orders of the writ Court, not being removed led to this contempt petition. Several rounds of affidavits and show cause(s) have been filed by

Patna High Court MJC No.1135 of 2016 (8) dt.03-08-2016 2/2 the petitioner and by the State defending their respective stand. The supplementary show cause filed today enclosing a photograph of the area in question confirms that the road whatsoever constructed on the land of the petitioner has now been ploughed and the petitioners can well use their respective lands for agriculture purpose. The choice is with the petitioners to demarcate the boundary.

However, in view of the supplementary show cause filed by the State, I find no reason to continue with the contempt application considering status placed on record. The contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) N.H./- U