Naresh Yadav @ Gora Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46076 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2018 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

NARESH YADAV @ GORA YADAV Son of Sukul Yadav Resident of Village - Kurasin, P.S.- Amas, Distt - Gaya.

2.

Karu Yadav Son of Bhuneshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Kurasin, P.S.- Amas, Distt - Gaya.

3.

Mosafir Yadav Son of Late Chandu Yadav Resident of Village - Kurasin, P.S.- Amas, Distt - Gaya.

4.

Sewak Yadav @ Sewika Yadav Son of Late Chamari Yadav Resident of Village - Kurasin, P.S.- Amas, Distt - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341,323,307,379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 257/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the FIR has been instituted against as many as 12 accused persons. There is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46076 of 2019(2) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 257/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T