Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53718/2024dismissed

Anjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-22Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53718 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2023 Thana- KHUDWA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anjay Singh Son of Ramashish Singh R/O Vill.- Lahasha, P.S.- Khudwan, Dist.- Aurangabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rikesh Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khudwan P.S. Case No. 77 of 2023 for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 504, 506, 324, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the uncle of informant, Akhilesh Singh with Garasa on his head who succumbed to injury during course of treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties. Both parties are next door neighbours and there is no allegation of repeated blow

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53718 of 2024(5) dt.22-11-2024 2/2 on the injured. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has three criminal antecedents. He is in judicial custody since 21.02.2024.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State assisted with learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he caused death to the victim by blow of Garasa.

6. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the parties, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected in connection with Khudwan P.S. Case No. 77 of 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T