← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63653/2017bail granted

Kumar Diwana v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-09Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63653 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -353 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ====================================================== Kumar Diwana, S/o Yogendra Mandal, Resident of Village- Ekasi, P.S.- Bariyarpur, Distt.- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 353 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-419/420 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that one Saurav Kumar was writing in the examination of recruitment of constable in place of this petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no seizure of any article was made in this case. The petitioner has been made accused merely on suspicion. There is no admit card on record to show that name of petitioner was there.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63653 of 2017 (4) dt.09-02-2018 of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 353 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T