Binod Ratnakar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59414 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== BINOD RATNAKAR Son of Devash Ratnakar R/o Vill.- Dhaghar Milki, P.S.- Krishnagar, District - Bhojpur at Present Residing at Shakuntala Niwas, Road No.- 1, Shrinagar, North of A.G. Colony, P.O.- Ashiana Nagar, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mrs Deepa Kumari Wife of Binod Ratnakar D/o Ramesh Sharma, At present residing at village - Purena, Haripur, P.S.- Koilawar, District - Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajkumar Rajesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 379, 498A and 504of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. All the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59414 of 2021(2) dt.07-12-2021 2/2 relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T