Malai Nat @ Jhalaku Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46517 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Malai Nat @ Jhalaku Nat S/o- Late Chhotak Nat Village- Koslchadhi PSRajpur District- Buxar 2.

Rita Devi W/o- Malai Nat @ Jhalaku Nat Village- Koslchadhi PS- Rajpur District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

XXX D/o- Nantu Nat Village- SK Baradhi Ps- Dinara Dist- Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Buxar (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 69, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners, who are parents of Shani Kumar have threatened her with dire consequences while she came out of the police station after registering a complaint against their son.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that the only allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46517 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 petitioners are that they have threatened. The main thrust of allegation is against petitioner's son namely, Shani Kumar. It has lastly been submitted that a statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submits that there is an allegation that the petitioners have threatened the victim of dire consequences.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Buxar (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T