← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52322/2024allowed

Arun Ram @ Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52322 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2024 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== ARUN RAM @ ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR RAM SON OF VIRENDRA RAM R/V- CHAKMRA, P.S.- EKMA, DISTT.- SARAN, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhijeet Abhigyan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 363/366A/506/34 of the IPC. 3.

Allegedly, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioner kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is prior land dispute between the parties. Earlier, one Rajendra Ram from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52322 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 petitioner's side had lodged a case against the informant's side under the SC/ST Act and under sections of IPC, thereafter, the informant has lodged this case against the petitioner's side. It is further submitted that there is contradiction in the statement of the victim as recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No.31 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T