Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11563 of 2025 ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Son of Devkali Kuwar, Resident of Village- Bela, P.O.- Aurangabad (bh), P.S.-Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad. 4.
The Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 5.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Aurangabad. 6.
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Aurangabad. 7.
The Prakhand Panchayati Raj Officer, Prakhand Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad. 8.
The Block Development Officer, Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 9.
The Circle Officer, Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 10.
The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organisation, Work Division, Aurangabad.
11.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bela, Prakhand-Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The matter relates to construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan in Gram Panchayat- Bela in Block & DistrictAurangabad.
3. In the case of Krishna Deo Kumar v. The State
Patna High Court CWJC No.11563 of 2025(2) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 of Bihar & Ors., the learned Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.02.2024 has held and observed that: "5. It is worth noting that so far the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan is concerned, the same is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat and a decision as to its situs lies entirely within the domain of Panchayat concerned and the State Government has exclusive jurisdiction to take a decision in this regard. So far the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, he has already represented before the concerned authorities, including the District Magistrate, Arwal and any direction of this Court would be uncalled for, in the matter."
4. In view of the aforesaid law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court, there is hardly any scope for entertaining this writ application, which relates to construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan.
5. In light of the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench, the present writ application is held to be nonmaintainable and hence, it is accordingly dismissed. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Shahnawaz/- U