Vyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50858 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2024 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Vyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav S/o- Late Nathuni Yadav Resident Of VillageBelaur, Ps- Guthani, Dist-Siwan 2.

Rabbi Yadav @ Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Kumar Yadav S/o- Vyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav Resident Of Village- Belaur, Ps- Guthani, Dist-Siwan 3.

Ranjit Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav S/o- Vyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav Resident Of Village- Belaur, Ps- Guthani, Dist-Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No.354 of 2024 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending before the court of C.J.M., Siwan.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 6 named accused persons including the petitioners against whom there is allegation of assault with deadly weapons to informant's family members, due to land dispute with the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50858 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the dispute has arisen due to purchased land dispute.

5. Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioners is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and the petitioners are named in the FIR and there is direct allegation of assault against them.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioners, if they surrender within 6 weeks and pray for regular bail, then the trial court shall pass order on merit without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T