Lalit Kishor v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46707 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2019 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Lalit Kishor Son of Prasidha Jamadar @ Prasidh Jamadar Resident of Village - Sanehi Tola, Lohrabad, P.S.- Piro, Distt - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Piro P.S. Case No. 101 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
One country made loaded pistol with one live cartridge is said to have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2019 having no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46707 of 2019(3) dt.25-09-2019 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 101 of 2019, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T