Dr. Damyanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1446 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Damyanti Kumari W/o Sitam Ram Singh, resident of Mohalla Chanakya Nagar, P.S. Begusarai, District Begusarai, a superannuated Associate Professor from S.K. Mahila College, Begusarai, District - Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Karim, Direct, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Dr. Saket Kushwaha, presently posted as Vice-Chancellor, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga.

4. Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, presently posted as Registrar, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga.

5. Sri Anil Kumar Chaubey, presently posted as Finance Officer, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga.

6. Abdesh Kumar Singh, presently posted as Principal, S.K. Mahila College, Begusarai, District - Begusarai.

.... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha AC to SC - 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 8.

25-01-2017 Today again, on call, a prayer is being made on behalf of petitioner for granting adjournment. Sri Ajay Bihari Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of L.N.Mithila University, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 22, submits that in supplementary show cause, a specific stand has been taken that entire grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. This fact was noticed by Sri Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner on 11-01-2017, however; it was got adjourned for examining the same.

Patna High Court MJC No.1446 of 2016 (8) dt.25-01-2017 2/2 Since, a specific stand has been taken in the supplementary show cause regarding compliance of the order of the writ court, particularly; statement made in paragraph 3 & 4 of the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the University, the Court is of the considered opinion that order of the writ court has already been complied with and as such, there is no need to further keep the matter pending.

The petition stands disposed of.

It goes without saying that if the petitioner feels that some amount is due, she would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U