← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7619/2004disposed

Shiv Pujan Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2021-12-09Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10199 of 1997 ====================================================== SHIV PUJAN TIWARI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7619 of 2004 ====================================================== SHIV PUJAN TIWARY ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10199 of 1997) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiva Ranjan, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4 Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, AC to SC-4 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7619 of 2004) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4 Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

These writ petitions have been preferred, inter alia, for quashing the order dated 30.08.1997 passed by respondent no.2 in Consolidation Revision Case No. 306 of 1995 and also for quashing the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sasaram, Rohtas passed on 24.11.1986 in Consolidation Appeal No.1304 of 1984-85 and for confirming the order of Consolidation Officer, Bhagwanpur passed on 11.02.1985 in

Patna High Court CWJC No.10199 of 1997(20) dt.09-12-2021 2/2 Case No.233/84-85.

After hearing the parties, this Court is of the opinion that both these matters can well be adjudicated by the Bihar Land Tribunal (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'Tribunal'). Accordingly, in view of proviso to Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of this case to the Tribunal forthwith. However, considering the fact that these cases were pending before this Court since long, it is expected that the Tribunal will hear and dispose of the cases within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of record of this case after giving proper notice to all the parties concerned, including the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, both these writ petitions stand disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U