Anuplal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13009 of 2015 Arising Out of P. S. Case No. -37 Year- 2013 Thana -MAJORGANJ DistrictSITAMARHI ====================================================== Anuplal Mahto S/o , Bhadai Mahto Resident of village Laldasi, P.s. Majorganj, District - Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 01-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of IPC. Allegation against the accused including the petitioner is to have participated in the murder of the deceased. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name has transpired during investigation merely on suspicion as the petitioner is the father of accused Kanti Devi. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. There was land dispute with the accused Ram Naresh Mahto and Kanti Devi, who were giving threatening to commit the murder of the deceased.

It is further submitted that the petitioner has no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13009 of 2015 (3) dt.01-06-2015 2/2 criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was absconding.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi/court concerned in Majorganj P. S. Case No. 37 of 2013 after framing of charge with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T