Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58529 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== MUKESH YADAV S/o Ramnandan Yadav R/o village- Bhatrandha, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Permanandpur (O.P.), District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. The informant alleges that on dispute relating to business the accused persons including the petitioner came and on the order of Ramnandan Yadav, all the accused persons assaulted the brother of the informant and when he went to save him, Pappu Yadav assaulted him by farsa causing injury on his hand and when his brother Kailash came to save him all the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58529 of 2021(4) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 accused persons snatched Rs.2,500/- along with watch. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner and the allegation is general and omnibus in nature. As far as causing injury to the informant is concerned, the same is on Pappu Yadav. He further submits that even the name of the brother of the informant is not disclosed in the FIR who sustained injury. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhepura (Parmanandpur) P.S. Case No. 307 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T