← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49470/2022bail rejected

Rajeev Kumar Singh @ Ladoo v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49470 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2012 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ LADOO Son of Amod Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Repura Rampur Balli, P.S.- Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 304 of 2012, instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is a case of commission of murder by setting fire due to which victim burnt to death.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has falsely implicated in this case. There is no eyewitness of this occurrence. The deceased lived along with petitioner after her husband death. On the basis of suspicion, the informant alleges that the petitioner caused death of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49470 of 2022(5) dt.06-02-2023 2/2 informant daughter. Petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2022. Learned APP appearing on behalf for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that witnesses vide Para 8 and 9, who are children of the victim supported the prosecution case and the postmortem report also corroborate the report.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Ranjeet/- U T