Rajesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53596 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2024 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Rajesh Singh SON OF Late Chandrama Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -BHARKUDIYA TOLA POLICE STATION- BIKRAMGANJ DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM 2.
BINOD SINGH SON OF RAJESH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -BHARKUDIYA TOLA POLICE STATION- BIKRAMGANJ DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 384, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, due to land dispute, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners are said to have abused and assaulted the informant's side brutally with deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. They been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53596 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. Both the parties are next door neighbours and there is admitted land dispute between them. Both sides have filed cases against each other. The injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioners have two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of the injuries i.e. simple, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T