Vinod Ray @ Binod Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51080 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2017 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Vinod Ray @ Binod Ray, aged about 45 years, male, Son of Late Vishnudeo Ray, Resident of Village - Gopalpur (Avdesh Tola), Ward No. 14, P.S.- Udakishunganj, Distt. - Madhepura (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Akash Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2017 dated 04.06.2017, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 385, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the F.I.R., it is alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant with sword due to which the informant got head injury. Thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons brutally assaulted the informant with lathi. It is also alleged that other accused persons have snatched the earrings and mangal sootra from the wife of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51080 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 2/3 There is also allegation of demand of ransom @ Rs. 500/- per day.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The entire allegations levelled against the petitioners are false and concocted. From perusal of the injury report, it appears that the nature of injury is simple caused by hard and blunt object. It is further submitted that the informant and petitioner are full brothers and the dispute was for a piece of land on account of which, the informant lodged the false case against the petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Uda-Kishunganj, Madhepura, subject
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51080 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 3/3 to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
(Khatim Reza, J) Gaurav Kumar/- U T