Raj Kishore Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63440 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2017 Thana- MASRAKH District- Saran ======================================================

1. Raj Kishore Manjhi, Son of Late- Dudhil Manjhi

2. Durgawati Devi @ Parwati Devi, wife of Sri Raj Kishore Manjhi, Both resident of Village- Gangauli, P.S. Masharakh, DistrictSaran at Chhapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Masharakh P.S. case no. 222 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the deceased died after 16 years of the marriage. Petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63440 of 2017(3) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 weeks from today in connection with Masharakh P.S. case no. 222 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 8th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T