Jahagir Alam @ Jahangir Ahamad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29573 of 2015 Arising Out of P. S. Case No. -2 Year- 2015 Thana -Motihari Rail DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== JAHAGIR ALAM @ JAHANGIR AHAMAD son of Naushad Alam Resident of Village- Belisarai, Police Station- Nagar (Motihari), District East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.31700 of 2015 Arising Out of P. S. Case No. -2 Year- 2015 Thana -Motihari Rail DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Raju Sonar @ Raju Kumar S/o Shambhu Prasad R/o Vill-Sankar Saraiya, Kolwari Tola,P.s Turkaulia, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.29573 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.31700 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 13-08-2015 Both these applications arise out of Motihari Rail P. S. Case No. 2 of 2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 365, 379,419,120 B of IPC, as such, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29573 of 2015 (2) dt.13-08-2015 2/3 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The accused-petitioners seek bail in the aforesaid case. It is submitted that the name of the petitioners has appeared in the confessional statement of co-accused Sanju Kumar Nishad who was apprehended on the spot. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, co-accused Sanju Kumar Nishad has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 13954 of 2015 (Annexure-2) and Md. Shams has also been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 24040 of 2015.

Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioners while opposing their prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in Motihari Rail P. S. Case No. 2 of 2015 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioners will not indulge themselves in similar or any other offence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29573 of 2015 (2) dt.13-08-2015 3/3

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioners.

3. The petitioners will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, their bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T