Balak Chaudhary And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57602 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2017 Thana- HISUA District- Nawada ======================================================
1. Balak Chaudhary, son of Late Lalo Chaudhari,
2. Damodar Chaudhary, Son of Lalo Choudhary.
3. Akhlesh Chaudhary, Son of Late Suresh Chaudhary, All are resident of Village Tugi Chak, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. C. Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is that 75 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioners.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The name of the petitioners has come on the basis of secret information as per F.I.R. The source and genuineness of the secret information has not been disclosed by the prosecution. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57602 of 2017(2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 75 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioners. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Iind-cum-Spl. Judge, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. case No.166 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T