← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7498/2014disposed

Lal Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-22Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7498 of 2014 =========================================================== Lal Babu Rai son of late Triloki Rai, resident of village - Birra, P.O. Sarai, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration Government of Bihar, Patna

3. District Magistrate, Madhepura

4. Additional Collector Incharge ( Estb ), Madhepura

5. President, District Consumer Redressal Forum, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Thakur Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad Mr. Dudh Nath Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binodjee Verma, G.P. 17 Mr. Krishn Kr. Singh, AC to G.P. 17 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-01-2015 Heard the parties.

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to give him benefit of pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/-, which was notified by the District Magistrate, Madhepura vide letter dated vide letter dated 12.07.2011. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents on 14th January, 2015. In paragraph-7 of the aforesaid counter-affidavit it has been stated that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has already been paid an amount of Rs. 2,08, 812/- on 30.06.2014 vide two separate bills. In paragraph-10 of the aforesaid counter-affidavit it has further been stated that the benefit of the pay scales of Rs. 4000- 6000/- has also been paid to the petitioner. Therefore, according to the respondents, the grievances raised on behalf of the petitioner have been redressed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7498 of 2014 dt.22-01-2015 2/2 The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous as the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed in view of the averments made on behalf of the respondents in the counter-affidavit filed on their behalf,.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U