← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29548/2015bail granted

Anurag Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-21Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29548 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -328 Year- 2013 Thana -GOPALGANJ CITY District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Anurag Kumar Gupta Son of Ramji Prasad Resident of village Naga Road , Ward No. 2, P.O. and P.S. Raxaul , Distrit - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Sager Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Iftekhar Mahmood(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.04.2015 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that on robbing of the truck of the informant First Information Report was lodged against seven unknown.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of co-accused Ram Lakhan @ Dhunmun. Statement has been made in para-9 of the petitioner that there is no recovery from the petitioner. Moreover, investigation has already concluded. The impugned order does not reflect that petitioner has been put on T.I.P.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29548 of 2015 (2) dt.21-07-2015 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 328 of 2013.

Since the petitioner has serious criminal antecedent, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, in two eventualities i.e. if the petitioner defaults for two consecutive occasions or gets substantially involved in some serious nature of offence. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T