← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32141/2015bail granted

Nishar Mian @ Md. Nishar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-05Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32141 of 2015 (4) dt.05-11-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32141 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2012 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Nishar Mian @ Md. Nishar Ahmad S/o Najuk Ansari Resident of villageRam Nagar, P.S.- Tarari, District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 212 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

First Information Report has been registered against unknown and during investigation the name of the petitioner transpires in the information furnished by spy and thereafter coaccused Sanjay Singh confessed his guilt stating the name of petitioner also in committing the crime.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no tangible material against the petitioner, without any cogent and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32141 of 2015 (4) dt.05-11-2015 reliable evidence chargesheet has been submitted. Similarly situated co-accused Sanjay Singh has been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.04.2004 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40257 of 2013 and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 09.04.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP is not in a position to distinguish the case of the petitioner from that of co-accused. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No.

212 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T