Raj Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29490 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2014 Thana -HATHAURI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Raj Kumar Manjhi, Son of Sajjan Manjhi, Resident of Village- Aaura, P.S.- Rasera, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kr. Virendra Narayan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown. During investigation, the name of the petitioner has appeared. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The stolen article has been recovered from the possession of the co-accused, who have been granted bail by the court below. The petitioner has been in custody since 26.11.2014. However, after investigation, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29490 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 2/2 The learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Rosera, Samastipur after framing of charge in Hathauri P.S. Case No.86 of 2014 with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T