Ansuman v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2288 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-686 Year-2016 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ansuman, Son of Late Balram Singh, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Naga Bigha Road, Police Station- Aurangabad (Town) District- Aurangabad, at present Flat No.501, Block-7, Shanthi Apartment, Jainagar, Near Croma Retail Shop, P.S.- Tilak Nagar, Beglore.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sushmita Shalini, Wife of Ansuman, Daughter of Deodar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Naga Bigha Road, Police Station- Aurangabad (Town), District- Aurangabad, presently resident of Village/Mohalla- Karma Road, Police Station- Aurangabad (Town), District- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP For opposite party No.2 :
Mr. Santosh Kr. Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2288 of 2018(2) dt.16-01-2018 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint case No.686 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T