Vikash Singh @ Vikesh @ Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48678 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2015 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VIKASH SINGH @ VIKESH @ VIVEK KUMAR S/o Jitendra Singh R/o Village- Dhoomnagar, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manindra Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 427, 324,307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant and his family members and the informant's son sustained severe injuries and was taken to the hospital in Muzaffarpur where he died during treatment.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48678 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail vide order dated 08.09.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38145 of 2015.The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 124 of 2015. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/ayush/- U T