Kailu Yadav @ Kailash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29133 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2010 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Kailu Yadav @ Kailash Yadav Son of Nanku Yadav, Resident of Village - Simaria, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.Roy Raman(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 224 and 225 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier this Court vide order dated 14.1.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 38989 of 2014 rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in jail custody.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has remained in jail for more than one year. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, Kailu Yadav alias Kailash Yadav, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29133 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2010, subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order including cancellation of bail and (iii) petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T