Dinesh Ram And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2279 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2017 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Dinesh Ram,

2. Mantu Ram, Both are sons of Late Ramdeo Ram @ Ram Balak Ram,

3. Dharamshila Devi @ Kanti Devi, Wife of Late Ramdeo Ram @ Ram Balak Ram,

4. Usha Devi, Wife of Munna Ram, All are resident of Village+P.S.- Kinjar, District- Arwal.

5. Kamlesh Ra @ Kamlesh Prasad, S/o Late Ram Chandra Ram, Resident of Ghatakan, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shyam Babu Ram, Son of Late Devlal Ram, R/o Village- Awdheshpur Chakjullah, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioners tortured the victim due to non-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2279 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 2/3 fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioners are in-laws of the victim. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsels for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Masaurhi, in connection with Complaint Case No. 82 (C) of 2017,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2279 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T