← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50881/2022allowed

Yash Kumar Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-12Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50881 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2020 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Yash Kumar Kamat Son Of Umakant Kamat Resident Of Village - Marneya, P.S.- Ladaniya, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Priyanka Kumari Wife of Yash Kumar Kamat Resident of village - Marneya, P.S.- Ladaniya, District - Madhubani, At present residing at Daughter of Tanuk Lal Kapar, resident of village Patanuka, Ward No. 5, District - Dhanusha (Nepal).

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50881 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/3 tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. However, the petitioner is ready to give Rs.5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) per month as maintenance to opposite party no.2 in first week of every month. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceeding. If the petitioner fails to give the aforesaid amount on two consecutive dates to opposite party no.2, his bail bond shall automatically be cancelled.

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with C.R. No. 341 of 2020 corresponding to T.R. No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50881 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 3/3

(2) of the Cr.P.C., If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

Learned court below is directed to issued notice to the informant for furnishing her bank account details. If she fails to furnish her bank account details the aforesaid amount will be deposited before the learned court below which will be released in favour of the informant/complainant after the informant/ complainant furnishes her bank account details. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U