Raushan Kumar Singh @ Raushan Kumar @ Gamgam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8870 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2017 Thana -KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Raushan Kumar Singh @ Raushan Kumar @ Gamgam Kumar, Son of late Ravindra Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-Fularh, Post Office Paroo, Police station Paroo, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2017 in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 209/2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither was any recovery of the vehicle made from his possession and only on the basis of suspicion he has been remanded in the present case.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8870 of 2018 (3) dt.06-03-2018 2/2 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, III, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 209/2017, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T