← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59125/2021bail granted

Binod Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-07Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59125 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2021 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== BINOD KUMAR MANDAL SON OF ADHIK LAL MANDAL R/O VILLAGE- PANCHOSIMAR, WARD NO.-03, P.S.- DIWANGANJ, DISTRICT- SUNSARI (NEPAL) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. The case relates to recovery of one country made pistol along with one live cartridge from the motorcycle of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59125 of 2021(2) dt.07-02-2022 2/3 innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the police has allegedly shown the recovery from the motorcycle which was said to be driven by the petitioner and the petitioner has no concern with the alleged motorcycle and the alleged arms. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 03.07.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59125 of 2021(2) dt.07-02-2022 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T