← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21469/2016rejected

Mukhlal Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-04Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21469 of 2016 (4) dt.04-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21469 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2002 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Mukhlal Bhuiyan Son of Late Mohan Bhuiyan Resident of Village - Simariya, Police Station - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birju Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K.Khare(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2002 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is the case of the year 2002, chargesheet was submitted against the petitioner showing him absconder. Petitioner has been apprehended and he is in custody since 19.12.2015. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner was not aware regarding this case, he was not named in the First Information Report, his name has come during investigation only on suspicion and on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, in this case co-accused Bhola Singh @

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21469 of 2016 (4) dt.04-07-2016 Bhola Kahar has already been allowed bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 4433 of 2009, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and, as such, he also deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner remained absconding since long.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of abscondance, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2002 pending in the Court of Sri. Rohit Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya.

However, the learned Court below is directed to take positive step so that the case be committed to the Court of sessions at once and the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail after framing of charge.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T