Savitri Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12771 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2017 Thana -BATH District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Savitri Devi, Wife of Umesh Prasad Singh @ Umesh Singh, Resident of Village- Bath, P.S.- Bath, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Bath P.S. Case No. 127 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that victim girl has given her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. wherein she has stated that she has voluntarily gone with Prince Kumar with whom she has love affairs. The petitioner is mother of Prince Kumar.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Bath P.S. Case No. 127

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12771 of 2018 (2) dt.09-03-2018 2/2 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T