Pramod Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56620 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -RISHIUP District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Pramod Mehta .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh No-10 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Rishiup P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-379, 354, 308 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation in the written report that this petitioner on the point of dispute for drainage assaulted the informant with iron rod on her head.

It is mentioned in the written report itself that the petitioner is Bhainsur of the informant.

The injury report of the informant has been produced during hearing of the bail petition which shows that she has sustained simple injury.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56620 of 2017 (2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Rishiup P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Aurangabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T