Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1356/2018bail granted

Raju Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-23Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.781 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -221 Year- 2017 Thana -SARAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Surendra Pandit, son of late Ram Briksha Pandit,

2. Dewanti Devi, w/o Surendra Pandit, both resident of village- Anantpur Gangauliya, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.1356 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -221 Year- 2017 Thana -SARAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Raju Pandit, S/o Sri Surendra Pandit, resident of village- Anantpur Gangauliya P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.781 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.1356 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 23-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Saraiya P.S. Case No.221 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are father-inlaw, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.781 of 2018 (3) dt.23-03-2018 2/2 In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No.221 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, West, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T