Kavita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54914 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Kavita Kumari D/O- Suresh Chandravanshi @ Suresh Singh R/V-Shivpur Chitauli Ps- Sasaram (M) District -Rohtas 2.

Deepak Kumar Son Of Suresh Chandravanshi @ Suresh Singh R/V-Shivpur Chitauli Ps- Sasaram (M) District -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366(A), 363, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against these petitioners is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.

4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54914 of 2024(3) dt.20-09-2024 2/3 submitted that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have committed no offence. He submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the sister of the petitioner no. 2 and petitioner no. 1 is an unmarried girl. There is allegation of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant against these petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the informant has intentionally concealed the real fact but by filing supplementary affidavit, he submitted that as a matter of fact the victim had love affair with one Rohit Kumar, Son of- Paras Singh Yadav, Resident of Vill. Godhaniya, P.O.- Samardiha, P.S.- Shivnagar, District- Rohtas and after marriage she is residing with said Rohit Kumar. As per school certificate, the victim is a major girl. Petitioners are person of clean antecedent and they are in custody for about one year.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-9th, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram Muffasil P.S. Case No. 16 of 2020

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54914 of 2024(3) dt.20-09-2024 3/3 with a condition that the petitioner will appear on each and every date fixed by the Court below.

7. The hard copy of the supplementary affidavit is kept on record.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Arish/- U T