← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48738/2025bail rejected

Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48738 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-637 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Dilip Kumar S/o Doman Chaudhary R/o Village- Dudhaila, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, 2.100 litres illicit country made liquor was recovered from the seized motorcycle of which this petitioner is registered owner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be owner of the vehicle in question. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48738 of 2025(2) dt.21-07-2025 2/2 vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, fact that illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T