Arbind Kumar Singh @ Aravind Singh @ Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49928 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- HARINMAR District- Munger ====================================================== Arbind Kumar Singh @ Aravind Singh @ Arbind Kumar S/o Late Lalo Singh @ Late Lalo Prasad Nishad R/o Village - Hanshu Singh Tola, P.S - Harinmar, Distt.- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Saurabh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP For the State :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Harinmar P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, registered for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 303(2), and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of prosecution, in short is that all the F.I.R. named persons allegedly assaulted the informant side, causing injuries to Mamta Devi, Nirjala Kumari, and Nitesh Kumar @ Nikesh Kumar and snatched ornaments worth Rs. 2,00,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both parties are agnates (gotiyas) as well as next-door neighbours. The allegations against the petitioner are general and omnibus in nature, with no specific overt act attributed to him. It is further submitted that a case and counter-case exist between the parties for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49928 of 2026(2) dt.28-07-2026 2/2 the same occurrence (Harinmar P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025), and except for a single injury (broken teeth) sustained by Nitesh Kumar, all other injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner bears clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the general and omnibus nature of allegations, the absence of any specific overt act of assault against the petitioner, the underlying dispute between agnates with a case and countercase, and the petitioner's clean antecedents, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Munger, in connection with Harinmar P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rashmi/- U T