Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23103 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2015 Thana -DARBHANGA District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Raushan Kumar son of Sri Satyendra Singh, resident of village- Bajaul, P.S.- Wajirganj, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kr.Jha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2016 Heard the parties.
This application, for grant of regular bail, arises out of Darbhanga Town P.S. Case No. 245 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2015. He is said to have asked the informant to give her ATM Card and after having taken the ATM Card tried to flee away. Upon hulla being raised, the petitioner was caught and the ATM Card was recovered from his possession.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that considering the period of incarceration and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, no tangible purpose would be served if the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23103 of 2016 (2) dt.26-05-2016 2/2 petitioner is allowed to remain in jail any more. Considering the nature of accusation and period of incarceration, this application is allowed. The petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Darbhanga Town P. S. Case No. 245 of 2015.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioner, abovenamed, shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required, and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court, on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ajaypd./- U T