Dr. Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56689 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2016 Thana -IMADPUR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Dr. Ranjeet Kumar S/o Rajbansh Paswan, R/o Village- Kachua, P.O.- Sakala Bazar, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Imadpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-47, 54, 57 of Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

It is alleged that ten litres of Mahua liquor has been recovered near Charugram Bihato, Sone River. Three persons were apprehended and they disclosed name of this petitioner stating that he used to visit the place to take wine. It is also alleged that one motorcycle which was seized by the police from the place of occurrence, belonged to the petitioner. The seizure list is enclosed with the written report which does not bear signature of the petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56689 of 2017 (2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Imadpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T