Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48584 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2022 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pappu Kumar Son of Chhotai Yadav R/V- Vilaspur, Ward No. 18, P.s- Ram Nagar, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 338 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 15.07.2022.
The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 20 litres of illicit IMFL/country made liquor from motorcycle.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48584 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 2/2 jointly occupied motorcycle and as such it cannot be said that recovery of illicit liquor was made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner. It is also submitted that seizure list is disputed on its face for the reason that same is not supported by independent witnesses rather by police personnels. Petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case has been completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tempering with the evidence. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list is appearing disputed, where petitioner is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 338 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Bagaha, West Champaran/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Archana/- U T