← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47322/2019bail rejected

Md. Wakil Quraishi @ Md. Wakil @ Wakil Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-01Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47322 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-783 Year-2018 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== MD. WAKIL QURAISHI @ MD. WAKIL @ WAKIL QURAISHI Son of Md. Gaffar Quraishi Resident of Village - Hemzapur, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No.783 of 2018 registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Gaya. The accusation is of causing burn injury to the deceased, the sister of the informant, by putting her on fire, by her husband (petitioner) and other in-laws for non-fulfillment of the dowry demand of cash Rs.2,00,000/-, who died in course of treatment at the Hospital.

Submission is that in course of investigation, Tejmul

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47322 of 2019(3) dt.01-10-2019 2/2 Ansari, one of the brothers of the deceased, has stated that his sister sustained burn injury in course of preparing the tea and died, later on, in course of treatment at the Hospital. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T