← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7220/2016disposed

Vinod Prasad Chourasia @ V. P. Chourasia And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-22The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7220 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Vinod Prasad Chourasia @ V. P. Chourasia, Son of Sri Premchand Chaurasia Resident of Mo. Sulemanganj Chowk Bazar, P.S. and Town - Sasaram District - Rohtas

2. Kripashankar Prasad, Son of Late Laxmi Shah, Resident of Mo. Sulemanganj Chowk Bazar, P.S. and Town - Sasaram District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Environment & Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. Bihar State Pollution Control Board through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna

7. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

8. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.

9. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

10. The Sasaram Nagar Parishad through its Chairman, Sasaram (Rohtas).

11. The Executive Officer Sasaram Nagar Parishad, Sasaram (Rohtas). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 For Nagar Parishad : Mr. Vijay Shankar Upadhyay, Advocate For the Intervenors : Mr. Najmul Hodda, Advocate ======================================================

Patna High Court CWJC No.7220 of 2016 (6) dt.22-06-2017 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 22-06-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that during pendency of the matter, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and, therefore, we dispose of the matter. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U